User talk:Mporter

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 15:02, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Mporter. In answer to your question about the "Technological Singularity" deletion on the Disinfopedia, I've posted an explanation. --Sheldon Rampton 01:00, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Movement of Spiritual Inner Awareness

I've restored this previously deleted page in order to give you the chance to improve the article and prove the notability of this sect (or cult ?). I don't want to be involved in any religious discussions. It's now up to you to prove your point in a NPOV article with the pros and the cons, otherwise the article will be referred to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Success ! JoJan 12:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Economic crisis of 2008

Good work on the updates. Bearian (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Obama stimulus plan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Obama stimulus plan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL. At this point the plan has been suggested, but until it happens—until the man is even president—there is no way now to know that this will happen.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution to global warming by Australia

Hi, Mporter. Nice to see your Contribution to global warming by Australia. I added a para. Not sure if the heading is the most appropriate one. Cheers dinghy (talk) 05:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not thwaites toungue

I'll sort this out. They mean Smith glacier as the third but I'll have to double check the references. Thanks for the question Polargeo (talk) 10:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that message. Yes in the diagram on that page the third glacier is Smith Glacier. I will add it in but a better reference than an interview with Chris Rapley is needed, one that actually lists the three glaciers. Probably one of the Eric Rignot papers I think Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008 Polargeo (talk) 10:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey vote request

Please vote in survey over whether to include text in History of the the Islamic Republic of Iran

Text and dispute is at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran&diff=274961453&oldid=274952179

Arguements

found in edit summary and at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran#Deletion_by_KneeJuan

Thank you --BoogaLouie (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marta Harnecker

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Marta Harnecker. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple time dimensions

Hi,

in this interesting article, you write:

Nonetheless, theories with more than one dimension of time have sometimes been advanced in physics, whether as a serious description of reality or just as a curious possibility.

Do you know any serious research (physical or philosophical) on the hypothesis of a three-dimensional reality, which can either be described in means of matter in a three-dimensional space or of matter in a three-dimensional time - i.e. space and time are just different aspects of the same three-dimensional thing (and the human concept of four-dimensional spacetime is just a perceptive illusion, which is reflected by our current level of mainstream physics)?

Any hints will be appreciated!

Peter --217.87.128.221 (talk) 11:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. I do not think the idea makes sense. However, see "Nige" on D R (Danny) Lunsford here. Mporter (talk) 03:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to be more specific. Various people have said that subjective time is three-dimensional (example). Various people have also said that only space exists (example). Various people have also tried to reduce space dimensions to subjective metaphysics (example). So maybe you can combine such perspectives, perhaps in a monadic framework. Probably what you say has already been attempted or asserted by someone somewhere. But it sounds somewhat artificial and contrived to me. Mporter (talk) 04:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So maybe you can combine such perspectives, perhaps in a monadic framework. Yes, I think that is what I am looking for. I was not speaking of "dimensions" in terms of human space-time-perception, but as of properties of the underlying framework (an utterly strange thing, which probably exists, as Kant noted in his Critique of Pure Reason: If there is a perception, then there must be something which is percepted and which can be thought [in terms of its properties]). Maybe it is misleading to call these properties "dimensions", and new terms have to be found.

Thanks for your thoughts. The Teruaki Nakagomi models look very interesting to me. If you encounter anything more which sounds like what I described above, I would appreciate if you could leave me a note here! -- Peter --217.87.170.183 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mporter! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 146 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Marta Harnecker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Mporter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Its snowing in East Asia (talk) 18:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2000s commodities boom

A tag has been placed on 2000s commodities boom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

origonal sythasis reserch on trading price conparisin sites!

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 82.18.196.185 (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lorraine Lisiecki

The article Lorraine Lisiecki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alternative theories of Al-Qaeda for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Alternative theories of Al-Qaeda, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative theories of Al-Qaeda until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ScienceApologist (talk) 23:18, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Williams (computer scientist)

The article Ryan Williams (computer scientist) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ttonyb (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:N-dimensional space

Template:N-dimensional space has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You Were Right About Saddam's Alleged 1967 Visit

Saddam was imprisoned in 1964. According to his official biography, he escaped in 1967. There's no way that he was made an army officer in that time. Thus, Livingstone's claim is highly dubious, and I removed it.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 05:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3rd nomination for deletion: Heim theory

Hi - you may be interested in this AFD. Feel free to comment. Thanks, Maschen (talk) 08:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FA review?

Hello,

I noticed that you occasionally edit articles on string theory. Right now, I'm working to bring the article AdS/CFT correspondence to FA status, but I'm having trouble finding people to review the article. I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it and tell us your thoughts at this page. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Polytope24 (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Postmodernism Generator

The article Postmodernism Generator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable web service. Unlike snarXiv, which is completely non-notable, PMG has at least a minute claim to it, so I've put it up for PROD instead of CSD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inanygivenhole (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikhail Khazin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mikhail Khazin, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bikeroo (talk) 10:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mporter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mporter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Belt and Road Initiative

		The China Star
		Thank you for creating the Belt and Road Initiative article, it will become important in the future.
		_{this WikiAward was given to Mporter by BeltedWuhan (talk) on 17:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mporter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Cambridge Analytica for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:43, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018 Russian nuclear weapons declaration for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Russian nuclear weapons declaration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Russian nuclear weapons declaration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Newroderick895 14:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mporter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Water town (China) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Water town (China), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 06:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Water town (China) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Water town (China). Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not for promoting your research findings. Please show how this is widespread information. Need years as to when it was coined as a model and the impact it has on the research community.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mporter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

Hello, Mporter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New IP moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, New IP, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:New IP

Hello, Mporter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New IP, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1954, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akira. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New IP

Hello, Mporter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New IP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Philip Elliott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Harwell and Shell model.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mediastan

The article Mediastan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:07, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mediastan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mediastan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediastan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 03:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Celia Green for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celia Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celia Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- car chasm (talk) 18:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mporter. Thank you for your work on Resurgent function. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The real work was done by de:Benutzer:Tensorproduct. I just translated it to English! Mporter (talk) 03:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mporter. Thank you for your work on Non-invertible symmetry. Acebulf, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I am not convinced this should be a standalone article. Would you be opposed to merging it into Symmetry (physics)?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Acebulf}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 21:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will add a bit of justification here. I agree that the topic is notable, but I am concerned that the article will never reach critical mass as-is. By merging into a larger article, (e.g. Symmetry (physics)) we get 30x the amount of page views, or 30x the likelihood that someone actually fleshes out the section, which we can then split out into its own article. Those numbers are accurate to the Summary (physics) page. What do you think? Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Acebulf: Whether or not the page is merged, Symmetry (physics) needs a section on "generalized symmetries", which along with the non-invertible symmetries, would also mention "higher group symmetries" and "higher form symmetries". I will think about adding something based on arXiv:2205.09545, then we can see how everything looks. Mporter (talk) 07:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]